Three Fundraising Lessons from a 365-Day Experiment

by Kivi Leroux Miller on December 7, 2010

in Fundraising,Guest Bloggers,Nonprofit Communications,Publication Management

When Marta Lindsey, the communications and development director at TransForm, told me about her experiment to see what she could learn about fundraising from all the charity solicitations that arrived in her mailbox over one year, I immediately asked if she would share the story with you. Here’s Marta’s account of what she learned.

A Guest Post by Marta Lindsey

A little more than a year ago, my mailbox got totally out of control.  It was so consistently stuffed with fundraising solicitations that my mailman started leaving magazines on the stoop.  The stack of unopened mail in my kitchen was practically a fire hazard.

I’m clearly not the only person getting frustrated by all this mail.  Smile Train even designed a solicitation around this idea: “Make one gift now and we’ll never ask for another donation again!”

I felt bad in the three ways: 1) overwhelmed in deciding which organizations to give to; 2) annoyed by the ever-present clutter in the kitchen; and 3) saddened by the sheer number of trees dying for all this mail.

So I decided to do an experiment.

I would save every solicitation I received for an entire year and see what I could learn to apply to the small nonprofit where I’m the communications and development director. Then I would decide which nonprofits to write checks to.  And finally, I would contact every organization and ask them to send me just one solicitation per year or take me off their list entirely.

A year later, no wonder I was feeling so overwhelmed: I was hit up by more than 50 organizations in the twelve months of the experiment.  Ten of these sent more than five pieces of mail apiece; five others sent me more than 10 pieces of mail apiece!  Only 15 were organizations I had ever given to.

Sitting on the living room floor with stacks of mail surrounding me, I quickly learned some small, simple lessons you can apply at your small nonprofit.

Lesson 1: Make Sure Your Gifts and Gimmicks Match Your Mission

I have supported Defenders of Wildlife’s important work to protect the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge for years and will continue to do so.  But I’m frustrated by their fundraising appeals.

Within the yearlong experiment, I received separately three pens encased in a huge piece of plastic so I could “save a wolf with one stroke of my pen.”  I also received a corroded metal Christmas tree ornament that was made in China.

I know big organizations like Defenders do this kind of thing because it works – at least well enough – in getting new members, but it seems inappropriate to have this wasteful, non-recyclable junk coming from an environmental organization (and in addition to the eight paper appeals they sent within the same time period).  All of these gifts/gimmicks run a serious risk turning off potential donors permanently as much as inspiring them to give.

Where I work, TransForm, we can’t afford to send anything with our mailings.  So we applied this lesson to the gifts we give for different donations levels.  With our social justice and environmental mission, we decided we simply couldn’t give t-shirts as gifts unless they were organic cotton and made under fair labor practices.  This makes them a lot more expensive – which means we can only give the t-shirts at pretty high gift levels ($80+) instead of as incentive for smaller donation amounts.  But this was worth it to us to avoid risking our credibility with potential donors.

Tip: Run gifts and gimmicks past a group of program staff and current donors to see if they raise any concerns before purchasing and promoting them.

Lesson 2: Assure Potential Donors Their Name Won’t Be Sold (But Only If It’s True)

Since I had only donated to 15 of the 50 of the nonprofits I was hit up by over the year, it’s pretty obvious some of the organizations I’ve given to are selling my information.

This isn’t an uncommon practice, but if your organization is small, you probably aren’t doing this.  And if you aren’t, you should promote this!  That’s because for potential donors like me, we are thrilled to learn that donating to an organization won’t mean a ton of solicitations from other nonprofits.

This is such an easy way you can increase donations from solicitation-weary folks like me.  But of course, only do this if you have a firm internal policy against sharing or selling contact information.

Tip: Put text on your email subscription, online donation pages, and even on your hard copy return devices letting people know their information is safe with you.  We use this language: “We will not sell or share your information.  Period.”

Lesson 3: Make It Easy for People to Ask for Less Mail – and Ideally from an Actual Human Being

Once I decided which organizations to write checks to, it was time to contact every organization that solicited me to tell them to either take me off their list or send me just one solicitation a year.

This proved much easier said than done – and taught me another lesson in how small nonprofits can have a competitive advantage in building a more authentic relationship with potential donors.

First, for many organizations it was hard to even find on their websites where to make this kind of request.  For large organizations I typically ended up on a generic “Contact Us” form field page after much searching and had to enter all kinds of information to be allowed to submit my request.

But for smaller organizations it was usually much easier: there was typically a staff list where you could quickly find an appropriate membership/development person and email them directly.  An actual human being – wow!

The difference between these two communications experiences only became more notable once I got responses.

Check out the terrible response I got from a generic email address at a very large organization when I asked to receive one solicitation per year.  The organization’s name has been blocked out to protect the guilty:

“Thank you for contacting the ————-.  You may be receiving mail from us because your name appears on mailing lists shared by numerous organizations such as ours. We were unable to find a record for you in our system based on your email address, physical address or name so we cannot reduce the mailings in your record but we will be able to remove you.”

I’m not even sure what this means!  But it was so different from the responses I got back from smaller organizations that clearly recognized that contacting me back about this was a valuable communications opportunity with a potential or existing donor.

Check out this polite, personal email from an actual human being I got almost immediately from the Yosemite Conservancy:

“Dear Ms. Lindsey, Thank you for your support of the Yosemite Conservancy.  As you requested, I have arranged for you to receive your request for support once a year, in November, when we solicit all donors requesting an annual solicitation.  Once again, thank you for your support.”

Providing contact information in appropriate places on your website and solicitations is such a simple way to provide better customer service and put a human face on your work, both of which help people connect with your mission and make them more likely to give.

At TransForm, we put contact info for the appropriate development staff person on our donate page, donation form, and anything else fundraising-related.  We also have internal deadlines for how quickly we seek to respond to these types of communications.

Your organization needs to be sure that you’ve made changes to your database so you can track preferences.  We have developed tracking for: 1) all postal mail okay; 2) year-end postal appeal only; 3) no postal fundraising; and 4) no postal mail of any kind.

Tip: Put the contact information for the right staff person for fundraising-related questions anywhere it’s appropriate to immediately improve your customer service.

What do you think of Marta’s experiment and her interpretation of the results? Share your thoughts in the comments.

P.S. Some Friendly Reminders . . .

  • Anonymous

    Great experiment! I agree that smaller organizations are at a tactical advantage because they can really personalize their replies. I am amazed time and again how by just doing the right thing (e.g. making it easy for people to contact your org, or replying as a human) you can really build loyalty among your supporters.

    Thanks for posting this experiment. Direct mailers take heed!

  • Mjohnston

    Great experiment! This year I tried replying to the first solicitation asking to be taken off of their mailing list. I keep a spreadsheet of who I donate to, so I don’t need the constant reminders. I also stopped donating to a large organization several years ago when I’m sure they spent more in solicitations to me than my initial donation.

  • Carol

    Tracking preferences is great if you remember in your DB query to delineate these preferences. Can anyone suggest a fail safe way to remember?!

  • Bonnie

    This is such incredibly good stuff. I’m inspired to do this as an individual, nevermind doing it as an experiment. Nonprofits better watch out if this catches on!!

  • Donna Mathwig

    My experience is with leading a very small non-profit, however, because of my experience at receiving multiple mailings ad nauseum throughout the year, we rarely do any ‘giving request’ mailings to our donor list. We do utilize social media, i.e., Facebook and Twitter, and will do an email send through Constant Contact that is general in nature, though always includes an invitation to give. For sixteen years we’ve chosen to increasingly focus on building relationships with our donors, and not be in a place of begging for dollars.

  • Diane

    I work for a nonprofit and we currently have 3 fundraisers a year. We strive very hard to develop 3 different mailings so that no one gets more than one solicitation a year. I really like the idea of having a donation page on the company/agency website. Thanks for the info

    Diane

  • http://www.facebook.com/jennifer.waggoner Jennifer Waggoner

    I’m just as frustrated by all the mail from organizations I’ve never supported and never plan to, particularly when they include junk with the letter. I like the suggestion to allow donors to indicate they only want to be solicited us once a year via mail.

  • Elizabeth Clawson

    What a smart experiment! I abhor direct mail appeals and share your frustration at the tidal waves of solicitations, including the ones that say “give once and we’ll never ask you again!”…because at least in my case, they DID ask again. Forget pens and other swag; I wish nonprofits would be more creative than to use direct mail at all. It’s so 20th-century. Your post is also a great reminder of one of the strengths of small nonprofits: customer service. Thanks for sharing your conclusions!

  • Pingback: Yosemite Conservancy highlighted for marketing best practices « The Exchange

  • Olson Pamela

    Wow! This is the kind of research the government pays a million dollars for! Great job Marta! I hope your advice and your integrity make it to other non-profits!

  • Marta Lindsey

    I think direct mail is still an important, necessary way to fundraise despite my out-of-control mailbox. And at my organization, we really rely on our year-end mail appeal and haven’t yet gotten our email appeals to yield as much as the mail. Actually, both email and mail appeals have the same issue right now: we’re all so inundated with both we start to shut down! What I want to know is can less be more? Or with all the noise we have to compete with, do we have to be noisy, too?

  • jodi

    It’s ridiculous that a large organization can’t add you to their do not solicit list! It may be true that you may not be in their database of past contributors, but nothing should stop them from adding you to the database with a do not contact code. There’s no excuse for bad customer service!

  • Carol

    A word of caution about your “We don’t share your name” line is that if you ever DO find yourself in a position where you want to grow your list, list exchanges are one of the more efficient ways to do this and you’ve closed yourself off from this possibility.

    In addition to requesting once-a-year solicitations, let organizations know not to rent or exchange your information… OR: give big. Most organizations won’t share $100+ donors with others and I think $100 to an organization you really believe has more impact than four $25 gifts to other organizations.

    I think that the organization with the bumbling response was attempting to say “Your name was on an acquisition list we got from someone else. Since you aren’t one of our donors, we had no plans to regularly solicit you throughout the year and can’t change that, but we’ll add you as a suppression for future acquisitions.” While I agree they did a bad job of explaining things, the Yosemetie Conservancy had a much easier task. It’s much harder to explain how you can’t promise to “remove” somebody from a list they were never really on.

  • Meri

    Good ideas, Marta. I have also asked to be moved to organizations’ “only send one solicitation” per year list, but I didn’t track to see if they actually did it. I still give about half through mail and half email. I want to stop giving through mail because I want to reduce the paper, but I don’t want my email box filled every month instead! So you have a good solution.

  • Pingback: Participate in a Marketing/Fundraising Experiment

  • Laura Orban

    This was really interesting. Several years ago after receiving multiple mailings requesting a membership donation from one organization I supported, I called because I knew I had already sent that donation. I was told their research showed that it was more effective to continue to send those mailings even to people who were members! I was so angry I stopped donating for a few years. I would like to think that even if it brings in money that will go to good use, an organization wouldn’t continue to ask supporters for an annual membership fee that had already been paid.

  • http://www.nonprofitmarketingguide.com Kivi Leroux Miller

    I hear comments like that a lot. It’s one of those “do the ends justify the means” questions.

  • Marta Lindsey

    Yes, I find it frustrating when I just gave a membership gift and then get another “renew your membership” request in far less than a year since the first gift. I think this is something nonprofits need to be really careful about. However, as a fundraiser I know that the people most likely to give are those who have already given! So of course you’re trying to test the waters to see if your donors have the capacity to give at higher levels – and it’s fine to ask again in less than a year for another campaign or a special gift… but it definitely needs to not be a “membership” ask.

  • Coochm

    Great article! I like the idea of checking a box to only receive one per year or be able to receive an electronic solicitation instead. I wonder how social media use is altering or replacing paper solicitation. It definitely costs more money to send paper than email, but since people get just as many email solicitations as paper, maybe it won’t alter behavior.

  • http://blog.socialsourcecommons.org/ Matt Garcia

    I tend to take the cynical view on things like this. I feel as though the “less is more” take is utopian and the reality is more “be noisy.” Some people support (“support” meaning getting communications) a couple organizations and some people support many but I would argue that the people who follow a messaging arc (frequency of comms, message, campaign) of a particular organization as close as the comms team wants them to pay attention to it are few and far between. Those people are certainly out there. However, in my opinion, the majority of people need to be reminded of an organization’s presence for them to even consider donating. (This is definitely coming from an email perspective though. No experience with direct mail so take with a grain of salt :)

  • http://blog.socialsourcecommons.org/ Matt Garcia

    I tend to take the cynical view on things like this. I feel as though the “less is more” take is utopian and the reality is more “be noisy.” Some people support (“support” meaning getting communications) a couple organizations and some people support many but I would argue that the people who follow a messaging arc (frequency of comms, message, campaign) of a particular organization as close as the comms team wants them to pay attention to it are few and far between. Those people are certainly out there. However, in my opinion, the majority of people need to be reminded of an organization’s presence for them to even consider donating. (This is definitely coming from an email perspective though. No experience with direct mail so take with a grain of salt :)

  • Spcafc

    I’ve eliminated mail solicitations from my mailbox EXCEPT for one local charity simply because I was tired of getting so much paper! Also many of them were from orgs I’d never donated to.

    While I think direct mail still works I think being ethical and following some guiding principles is important. Plus customer service is a must – make it easy for me to get off your mailing list, be solicited once a year or only get email. Consumer choice is important to keep donors happy and donating!

    I run a pretty small org and we only mail out a newsletter every quarter. Most of of solicitation for donations is done online. We do plan on sending an appeal via mail this year for a special project but won’t do this on a regular basis. I know it flies in the face of how direct mail is said to work but my community isn’t average and we’ve learned how they respond to appeals best – in person or online.

  • Marta Lindsey

    This is a great comment because it goes to how important it is to send things that AREN’T fundraising appeals. Newsletters are expensive to produce, but we’ve started a really short “Advocacy Update” that has a super basic design, is just a few pages, and let’s us highlight the work that’s at the heart of our brand without a huge expense (in terms of time or money). We’ve seen people give more because they felt in the loop… not because we were sending postal appeals all the time!

Previous post:

Next post: